Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:55:57 +0100 From: Juraj Lutter <juraj@lutter.sk> To: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> Cc: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, Andrei <az@azsupport.com>, elastic@FreeBSD.org, glewis@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: textproc/elasticsearch7 Message-ID: <3F23F8CD-C0A9-4003-B628-BB1CFCBBC818@lutter.sk> In-Reply-To: <440f673d-95fc-be04-2c56-9674c53f9fda@eyesbeyond.com> References: <20200219140012.5e659502@azsupport.com> <66e3d945-4d70-23d0-7473-7712ec7c5a2b@quip.cz> <440f673d-95fc-be04-2c56-9674c53f9fda@eyesbeyond.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 19 Feb 2020, at 16:52, Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> wrote: >=20 > On 2020-02-19 06:57, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >> Andrei wrote on 2020/02/19 14:00: >>> Hi, >>>=20 >>> How about update port to 7.6.0? Thanks! :) >>=20 >> I think the port will be relatively easy and I can try to do the work >> (patch & test) but what about related ports: logstash, beats, kibana? >> Aren't there a problem to have Elastic 7.6 but other ports still on = 7.5? >>=20 >> Kind regards >> Miroslav Lachman >=20 >=20 > Currently there are no beats or kibana ports for 7.x. The beats port > means moving the current beats port to beats6 and creating a beats7.=20= > The kibana 7.x port likely needs someone with some more Node expertise > to comment on the PR, since last I checked it required a specific > version of Node that the ports system has passed over. 7.6.x may have > changed that but I haven't looked yet. >=20 >=20 > Also, I don't believe that it is true that you have to be all on the > exact same version for things to be interoperable, although we should > verify that. I maintain ELK 6.x ports, can look at 7.x, too. otis =E2=80=94 Juraj Lutter URL: http://www.wilbury.sk/ XMPP: juraj@lutter.sk Do not hesitate to inquiry for professional services!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F23F8CD-C0A9-4003-B628-BB1CFCBBC818>