Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:53:44 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> To: Stephan Uphoff <ups@tree.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: splxxx level? Message-ID: <4133BE08.1070405@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <1093909301.61235.410.camel@palm.tree.com> References: <20040830.102606.130865377.imp@bsdimp.com> <20040830.111428.56562495.imp@bsdimp.com> <4133682D.3000403@freebsd.org> <20040830.120124.28086427.imp@bsdimp.com> <41336DC8.7080808@freebsd.org> <Pine.LNX.4.60.0408301548440.4347@athena> <1093909301.61235.410.camel@palm.tree.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stephan Uphoff wrote: > Hi, > > Disclaimer: I never developed for FreeBSD 4.X > and might be a few miles off target... > > I vaguely recall seeing that vinum issues > new strategy calls to member disks > in the context of a buffer's biodone callback. > > Because of this mixing local and network > disks in a vinum set could cause the network > disk's strategy to be called in the the > interrupt context of the local disk controller. > ( And the other way round?) > > Interesting observation, and I don't have a good answer for that. I guess for now it'll be prudent to avoid mixing subsystems like this. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4133BE08.1070405>