Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:14:38 -0700
From:      Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org, Andrey Beresovsky <and@rsu.ru>
Subject:   Re: Boot hangs on ips0: resetting adapter, this may take up to 5 minutes
Message-ID:  <4424532E.30004@samsco.org>
In-Reply-To: <200603241440.30487.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <20060215102749.D58480@brain.cc.rsu.ru> <200603241057.59460.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060324192302.P797@brain.cc.rsu.ru> <200603241440.30487.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday 24 March 2006 13:12, Oleg Sharoiko wrote:
> 
>>On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>>JB>Hmm, well that interrupt storm is not due to a misrouted interrupt, it
>>JB>might be a bug in the bge(4) driver.  Can you try compiling a kernel w/o
>>JB>USB and seeing if you can still reproduce the interrupt storm?
>>
>>Yes.
>>
>>db> show intrcnt
>>irq1: atkbd0            2
>>irq4: sio0              3672
>>irq6: fdc0              6
>>irq9: acpi0             1
>>irq14: ata0             36
>>irq16: bge0             2592958
>>irq28: ips0             728
>>cpu0: timer             143147
> 
> 
> Hmm, you might need to look at bge(4) and figure out what condition it
> is interrupting on, and why the driver isn't handling that condition.
> 
> 
>>John, can you tell anything about another case, for which interrupt 
>>counters are:
>>
>>db> show intrcnt
>>irq1: atkbd0            1
>>irq4: sio0              3
>>irq6: fdc0              2
>>irq9: acpi0             345147
>>irq14: ata0             1
>>cpu0: timer             57995
>>
>>Does this also show an interrupt storm? This one has happened without bge 
>>in kernel. I'm asking because I've seen several different scenarios of 
>>hangs and this is from one of them. I'll try to reproduce all cases and 
>>gather interrupt statistics from all of them. I'm wondering can't all this 
>>cases be caused by one common reason behind all of them.
> 
> 
> This just looks like you aren't getting interrups from devices at all.
> 

345,000 interrupts from scpi0 seems high.

Scott




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4424532E.30004>