Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:08:59 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> To: Martin Nilsson <martin@gneto.com> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache Message-ID: <4450EC9B.1050101@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <44505784.2030806@gneto.com> References: <20060425090739.8470143f.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <005301c668ab$39c4c150$8b00a8c0@multiplay.co.uk> <444E8F8A.9030409@rogers.com> <17487.34074.833134.823847@canoe.dclg.ca> <444F8912.4010604@rogers.com> <44505784.2030806@gneto.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Martin Nilsson wrote: > Mike Jakubik wrote: >> As much as i love AMDs cpus, the availability of good server >> motherboards and chipsets stinks, hopefully that will change when >> socket AM2 comes out. > > That is an old myth: http://www.supermicro.com/Aplus/ Its not an old myth. Find me a single cpu opteron board, with dual Intel network cards (bge and nve suck ass) connected to a PCIe bus. Sorry, it doesn't exist. You have your pick of the old AMD chipset, the crappy Nvidia, or the unsupported ServerWorks, which still doesn't have PCIe.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4450EC9B.1050101>