Date: 29 Dec 2004 13:44:09 -0500 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: superfluous libraries? Message-ID: <44fz1px7uu.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <16850.9035.858785.417563@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <16850.9035.858785.417563@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> writes: > While running portsclean I got this: > > Cleaning out /usr/ports/packages... > ** /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.3 is shadowed by /lib/libcrypto.so.3 > /lib/libcrypto.so.3 <- ? > /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.3 <- openssl-0.9.7e_1 > --> This may be an undesirable situation > Leave /lib/libcrypto.so.3 (specify -i to ask on this) > > ** /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.3 is shadowed by /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 > /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 <- ? > /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.3 <- openssl-0.9.7e_1 > --> This may be an undesirable situation > Leave /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 (specify -i to ask on this) > > Is there any reason not to delete the versions that came from > openssl-0.9.7e_1? Obviously I don't want to delete the port, but > these particular files? It sounds like you don't want to use the port's version of the libraries. If that's the case, you *can* delete the port. If you want to be using the port, you could remove the base system's copies (or overwrite them; I think the port has a knob to do that). If you want to sometimes use one and sometimes the other, then the easiest course is probably to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH accordingly.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44fz1px7uu.fsf>