Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:56:11 +0300 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: ElBarto <elbarto@arcadebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: binary mtree for openafs port(s) Message-ID: <49841540@bs1.sp34.ru> In-Reply-To: <4946E27E.1050803@arcadebsd.org> (elbarto@arcadebsd.org's message of "Tue\, 16 Dec 2008 00\:04\:30 %2B0100") References: <60571528@bs1.sp34.ru> <01693389@bb.ipt.ru> <4946E27E.1050803@arcadebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
ElBarto <elbarto@arcadebsd.org> writes: > Boris Samorodov wrote: >> this is time to decide which mtree for binaries is apropriate >> for openafs port(s). That's my proposal: >> >> PREFIX=/usr/local >> BINDIR=$PREFIX/bin >> SBINDIR=$PREFIX/sbin >> >> SBINDIR: all *server + upclient BINDIR: all other binaries >> >> What do you think? Thanks! > > I'll prefer to have all the *server in $PREFIX/libexec/openafs like > the pkgsrc for netbsd. That makes sence. > As those binaries are not intend to be called manually it seems normal > to not have them > in /usr/local/bin or /usr/local/sbin. > Just look at the pkgsrc, I kind of like the way it is done. This package contains the whole distribution. This is just what we do have now, but ee are going to separate server and client files. How can we do it? WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49841540>