Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:36:51 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Ben Kelly <ben@wanderview.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WITHOUT_MODULES, does it actually work? Message-ID: <4B036BD3.4020900@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <BB106D32-DF64-4086-801F-286050314200@wanderview.com> References: <200911172021.16848.gnemmi@gmail.com> <41D86F39-D98A-4195-8345-765E0F742FAE@wanderview.com> <19e9a5dc0911171614l42f4c90ci2abce9982727ef61@mail.gmail.com> <4B033E22.3060700@FreeBSD.org> <8727F2A4-B830-43EE-BB9B-A17798374C00@wanderview.com> <4B034899.9090408@FreeBSD.org> <BB106D32-DF64-4086-801F-286050314200@wanderview.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ben Kelly wrote:
> On Nov 17, 2009, at 8:06 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> Ben Kelly wrote:
>>> It seems there are some left over bits then. I have this in /usr/src/sys/modules/Makefile:
>>>
>>> .for reject in ${WITHOUT_MODULES}
>>> SUBDIR:= ${SUBDIR:N${reject}}
>>> .endfor
>> Well it seems my search was not exhaustive.
>>
>> My recommendation then would be to file a src PR so that someone can
>> look into it. :)
>
> I've opened a doc PR for the bad example in the handbook and a conf PR for the patch to make WITHOUT_MODULES work from the kernel config file using makeoptions. I haven't gotten PR numbers back from the system yet.
You can add to the mix the fact that options like modules_override and
without_modules are documented in make.conf(5) instead of in
src.conf(5) which is where (arguably) they should be.
Doug
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B036BD3.4020900>