Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 05 Jan 2011 20:41:17 -0800
From:      Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com>
To:        Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Linux kernel compatability
Message-ID:  <4D2547ED.6080402@feral.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110106023014.GA22349@vniz.net>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1101031017110.1450@desktop> <20110103220153.69cf59e0@kan.dnsalias.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1101031859290.1450@desktop> <20110104082252.45bb5e7f@kan.dnsalias.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1101041030120.1450@desktop> <20110105124045.6a0ddd1a@kan.dnsalias.net> <20110105175926.GA2101@vniz.net> <AANLkTinOQFXzP_S%2BRLaJnqPAszAgs1Z7DPaRj6DywT1V@mail.gmail.com> <4D24E5B6.8060904@feral.com> <20110106023014.GA22349@vniz.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


>> Hmm. Well, that's a non-starter. Storage vendors provide tools for Linux
>> and Windows. That's it. Those tools have to be used on FreeBSD.
>> Therefore, binary execution of such tools, and the infrastructure to
>> support that, is pretty much mandatory.
> Minimal Windows required to run storage configuration tools may run just
> from USB flash drive, you don't need to infect FreeBSD just for that.
>

No, that's a non-starter still



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D2547ED.6080402>