Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:40:49 +0100 From: Eduardo Morras <nec556@retena.com> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS Few Questions Message-ID: <4EB899200026A45B@> (added by postmaster@resmaa12.ono.com) In-Reply-To: <CAB25XEUj6%2BNfDgQ_Odg4r1Ga%2BosRMC4Ww10E%2Bq1tM6ccPAR5hg@mail.g mail.com> References: <CAKy=mtCcHavRFh16yaVH86Oh6DgePmxOhbQmmAySxWA5Zn8-yA@mail.gmail.com> <4ec60f6b.893a440a.4ce1.ffffa30dSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <CAB25XEUj6%2BNfDgQ_Odg4r1Ga%2BosRMC4Ww10E%2Bq1tM6ccPAR5hg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:33 18/11/2011, Istv=C3=A1n wrote: >No problem for the most of the MySQL DBAs=20 >because consistency is not in their dictionary anyway :) I mean that surely db will be corrupted and=20 nothing could be recovered. I know postgresql and=20 there you have a begin snapshot - end snapshot=20 for this topic, data changes are stored in=20 temporal archives and main db files are=20 consistent, allowing you to make a filesystem snapshot. For mysql don't= know.=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EB899200026A45B>