Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 07 Jan 2012 14:44:01 +0100
From:      Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de>
To:        Da Rock <freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: linux-f10-nss_ldap: my first port - be gentle :)
Message-ID:  <4F084C21.5030807@gwdg.de>
In-Reply-To: <4F08421E.2040300@herveybayaustralia.com.au>
References:  <4F0446B7.4090703@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120104142757.1c77c347@ernst.jennejohn.org> <4F04E648.9090206@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120106224635.000034e3@unknown> <4F07B21E.3070607@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120107101111.129121b2@ernst.jennejohn.org> <4F08421E.2040300@herveybayaustralia.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07.01.2012 14:01 (UTC+1), Da Rock wrote:
> On 01/07/12 19:11, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>> On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 12:46:54 +1000
>> Da Rock<freebsd-ports@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>> And finally checksums: I create a checksum for the port, the linux sites
>>> have checksums, and I was advised in passing to check the checksums
>>> match. The checksums are going to differ aren't they? Linux and BSD
>>> checksums wouldn't be the same, surely?
>>>
>> MD5 checksums should always match - it's the same algorithm. Not sure
>> what the various distros use for Linux.
>>
> Thats my point - linux uses SHA256 I believe.


If I am not totally wrong here, FreeBSD has changed its ports checksums 
towards SHA256 for a while now. See for example

#head emulators/linux_base-f10/distinfo.i386
SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/10/basesystem-10.0-1.noarch.rpm) = 
16ad30fc4e4efbb61c62dc2c6ec55d66273a51579421b3a7e12114f9e5313b05
SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/10/basesystem-10.0-1.noarch.rpm) = 2915
SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/10/bash-3.2-30.fc10.i386.rpm) = 
83e29d12db4274568b612d61945669cf520222b20ca4dcfba995ccdda48d3afb
SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/10/bash-3.2-30.fc10.i386.rpm) = 1887256
SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/10/bzip2-1.0.5-3.fc10.i386.rpm) = 
2b70c36689f5bff15309c360f479f67bdcb5defcb1bbd7d24505bbb53b7a5360
SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/10/bzip2-1.0.5-3.fc10.i386.rpm) = 50129
SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/10/bzip2-libs-1.0.5-3.fc10.i386.rpm) = 
6c2ff130e5114c5d7cf5e0d5a30c7cd10c92e2602c1a4c12bc94f3f53ab47998
SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/10/bzip2-libs-1.0.5-3.fc10.i386.rpm) = 39174
SHA256 (rpm/i386/fedora/10/compat-db-4.6.21-5.fc10.i386.rpm) = 
bead077a94f027f3cc1c115c9ea8602f5807c1e23242b355befdbb1149ad2168
SIZE (rpm/i386/fedora/10/compat-db-4.6.21-5.fc10.i386.rpm) = 10267


> And thats not my biggest problem. As I suspected the linux sites have
> removed the rpm, so I have to either find it on a host somewhere or host
> it myself. My goal is to somehow prepend MASTERSITES to look to my host
> first, then one of the linux sites, then a backup host? and hopefully
> one will hit if mine is down for whatever reason.
>
> Has anyone had any experience with rpm.pbone.net?




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F084C21.5030807>