Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:26:26 +0200 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/162991: java/openjdk6 fails to build Message-ID: <4F5E15A2.204@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201203081309.55633.jkim@FreeBSD.org> References: <201203080750.q287oEA5033004@freefall.freebsd.org> <201203081309.55633.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Thursday 08 March 2012 02:50 am, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: >> Ok, I found time to investigate it. >> >> Everything is about arch guessing. java/openjdk7 substitutes amd64 >> for x86_64 while java/openjdk6 doesn't. I just added missing bits >> from correspondent java/openjdk7 patch. >> >> Redports build: >> https://redports.org/buildarchive/20120307160255-45601 >> >> Patch attached. > > Sorry but it doesn't make any sense. I guess you are patching this: > > ... > # Platform settings specific to BSD > ifeq ($(PLATFORM), bsd) > OS_VERSION := $(shell uname -r) > # Arch and OS name/version > mach := $(shell uname -m) > archExpr = case "$(mach)" in \ > i[3-9]86) \ > echo i586 \ > ;; \ > *) \ > echo $(mach) \ > ;; \ > esac > ARCH := $(shell $(archExpr) ) > ARCH_FAMILY := $(ARCH) > ... > > Unless "UNAME_m" environment variable is set, there is no way that > this patch does anything at all. > > % uname -r > 10.0-CURRENT > % uname -m > amd64 > % env UNAME_m=x86_64 uname -m > x86_64 > > I believe OpenJDK7 added it because some BSDs (e.g., DragonFlyBSD) > return x86_64 for "uname -m". So why it ends up in our port and not in DragonFlyBSD's pkgsrc? > BTW, does "make DISABLE_MAKE_JOBS=yes" make any difference? Actually after successful build I can't reproduce this issue anymore. I seem to miss some bits of data so I'll try to retest in clean environment. -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F5E15A2.204>