Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 05:08:35 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell <scheidell@FreeBSD.org> To: <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: .if ARCH / BROKEN, or 'NOT_FOR_ARCH'? Message-ID: <4F83F893.7040500@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I believe there was a discussion a while back, and if you used this: .if ${ARCH} == "sparc64" BROKEN= does not compile on sparc64: assertion failed .endif it is POSSIBLE that cluster runs that test broken ports could fix them (accidentally), but, wasn't the opinion that you might as well use ' NOT_FOR_ARCH(s)? ' -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F83F893.7040500>