Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 16:13:54 -0500 From: Marco Muskus <marcomuskus@une.net.co> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: centos@centos.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o Message-ID: <501EE212.3090403@une.net.co> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208051321170.21508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <CAFBRBcoxr5HLVipX5L5=qhEZ7pOW%2B4NmWJwy3GsL_DH74Fm%2ByQ@mail.gmail.com> <501D8A3D.1000707@une.net.co> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208051321170.21508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El 05/08/12 06:22, Wojciech Puchar escribió: >> Hi Ashkan, >> >> I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the >> feature set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first I'll >> go with ZFS because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be >> the differentiator. > true. it is consistently slow. > > REALLY from what tale do you people get such a statements. There is no tale, only a feature set: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zfs#Features > > >> >> Look at L2ARC and ZIL to improve ZFS speed. > > it's far better to just put manually heavily used things to SSD. > Yes ! That's what actually ZFS do with SSD put the most used elements on it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?501EE212.3090403>