Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 07 Oct 2013 12:22:21 +0400
From:      fbsd-mbox <fbsd-mbox@mail.ru>
To:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Fwd: Problem with IPSec setup
Message-ID:  <52526F3D.2060404@mail.ru>
In-Reply-To: <524D99EB.5060508@mail.ru>
References:  <524D99EB.5060508@mail.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Hi all,
forwarded from questions@ 'cause no reply received and obviously none 
expected.


Does anyone have a clue why kernel always directs ESP packets via
default route (or default gateway in FIB 0), even if there are other
FIBs with per-interface routes?

I'm stuck with the gateway, which is connected to 2 ISPs and the
necessity to configure IPSec tunnels on both external channels. Using
setfib(8) I've managed to successfully establish an IKE session via both
channels (using a separate instance of racoon per each channel), but the
tunnel is just not working.
Using IPFW's setfib option does not make any difference.

Is this a bug or I'm missing some point?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"







Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52526F3D.2060404>