Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 13:37:10 +0200 From: Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> To: Jan Mikkelsen <janm@transactionware.com> Cc: andre@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Stable Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: r256920 missing in stable/9 and releng/9.3 Message-ID: <53BA8666.9040608@omnilan.de> In-Reply-To: <37229F0A-4BEA-4712-9AE1-5446A630AF9F@transactionware.com> References: <37229F0A-4BEA-4712-9AE1-5446A630AF9F@transactionware.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC40763EF778E2CD6C77B80B8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bez=FCglich Jan Mikkelsen's Nachricht vom 24.06.2014 04:49 (localtime): > Hi, >=20 > I=92m bringing 9.3-RC1 into our local Perforce depot and moving our loc= al patches to 9.2 forward. >=20 > I noticed that r256920 (changing sys/netinet/tcp_input.c) has not been = MFC=92d. It was listed as =93MFC after 3 days=94 back in October 2013. >=20 > Is this patch missing for a reason? I'm wondering too if there's any good reason not to MFC? Thanks, -Harry --------------enigC40763EF778E2CD6C77B80B8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlO6hmYACgkQLDqVQ9VXb8jA/wCgoGk54m2vhz1uu9503Ktg5zYD qd0An3zRZSw/tNCQ8NLT34K7mvlaVnKa =fqkH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC40763EF778E2CD6C77B80B8--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53BA8666.9040608>