Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 09:32:28 -0500 From: Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu> To: Goran Tepshic <purpleritza@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBS(s)D Message-ID: <53DA537C.9030202@my.hennepintech.edu> In-Reply-To: <CADLW%2Bu1MmxnBJjRfFBskTE11sZTJbEZaG9En0z25xmoWEVSr9w@mail.gmail.com> References: <53DA3AF8.2090600@webrz.net> <53DA3C5D.3010001@my.hennepintech.edu> <CADLW%2Bu1MmxnBJjRfFBskTE11sZTJbEZaG9En0z25xmoWEVSr9w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2014.07.31 08:19, Goran Tepshic wrote: > Is ZFS really that much more awesome than UFS for regular desktop usage? > I noticed that pretty much majority of people in FreeBSD community advocate > ZFS, probably for it's features, but is it really that much more performant and > awesome than default file system? Yes, ZFS really is that awesome, but that isn't why I mentioned it. The OP may have heard of issues with ZFS and TRIM and so thought that there could be issues overall with using SSDs on FreeBSD. Sending back to the list since you probably meant to send it there instead of only to me.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53DA537C.9030202>