Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 00:31:08 +0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@ixsystems.com>, Chris Watson <bsdunix44@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: pNFS server Plan B Message-ID: <61bf7e38-4164-c784-6301-50e73564745c@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <B2907C1F-D32A-48FB-8E58-209E6AF1E86D@ixsystems.com> References: <1524639039.147096032.1465856925174.JavaMail.zimbra@uoguelph.ca> <D20C793E-A2FD-49F3-AD88-7C2FED5E7715@ixsystems.com> <7E27FA25-E18F-41D3-8974-EAE1EACABF38@gmail.com> <B2907C1F-D32A-48FB-8E58-209E6AF1E86D@ixsystems.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19/06/2016 9:50 AM, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> 1. Are we talking about block-level clustering underneath ZFS (e.g. HAST or ${somethingElse}) or otherwise incorporated into ZFS itself at some low level? If you Google for “High-availability ZFS” you will encounter things like RSF-1 or the somewhat more mysterious Zetavault (http://www.zeta.systems/zetavault/high-availability/) but it’s not entirely clear how these technologies work, they simply claim to “scale-out ZFS” or “cluster ZFS” (which can be done within ZFS or one level above and still probably pass the Marketing Test for what people are willing to put on a web page).
umm look at Panzura who have been selling this on FreeBSD for 4 years
<plug>and need FreeBSD devs in the bay area (or closer than me))</plug>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?61bf7e38-4164-c784-6301-50e73564745c>