Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 13 May 2003 17:10:24 -0700
From:      Jordan Hubbard <jkh@apple.com>
To:        Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: A modest proposal for better errno values...
Message-ID:  <75B77572-85A0-11D7-BE4E-000393C6E688@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <p05210614bae7240b759e@[128.113.24.47]>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
If it's just used for kernel errors, I was pretty happy with the 
EDONTPANIC suggestion someone made earlier. :)

- Jordan

On Tuesday, May 13, 2003, at 03:51 PM, Garance A Drosihn wrote:

> At 1:57 AM -0700 5/13/03, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
>> ... and "yeah, that's a pretty silly errno value and in rather
>> colloquial english at that, let's pick a more descriptive name
>> like ``EUSERERR'' or something which makes any code using it
>> more clear."
>
> I think it is fine to change the name, but EUSERERR is certainly
> not right.  The bikeshed is then picking an appropriate name.
>
>   EBADCOMMIT(ER)  ESKIPDISASTER  EAVERTWOE  EAVOIDABYSS
>
> seem like some plausible names, given the description of the
> history behind the name, and what error is used for.  I'm sure
> another hundred could be thought of after about 15 minutes with
> a thesaurus.
>
> -- 
> Garance Alistair Drosehn            =   gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu
> Senior Systems Programmer           or  gad@freebsd.org
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute    or  drosih@rpi.edu



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?75B77572-85A0-11D7-BE4E-000393C6E688>