Date: Wed, 25 Oct 1995 16:34:54 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu> Cc: Gary Palmer <gary@palmer.demon.co.uk>, stable@freebsd.org, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Oct 20 snap install... Message-ID: <8031.814664094@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 25 Oct 1995 18:18:20 CDT." <Pine.BSF.3.91.951025180953.227B-100000@fieber-john.campusview.indiana.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I don't like the terminology `Active' because if a user does not know the > difference between active and passive, it does not provide any useful hint > about which FTP option to use. Saying just `FTP' and `Passive FTP' gives > an obvious, and probably correct, choice to users who don't know what > `Passive FTP' means. I'm inclined to agree, actually. It always struck me as awkward the way it was worded before. Changed! Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8031.814664094>