Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 16:36:01 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [rfc] add MK_TELNET_SSL as a build option Message-ID: <87668.1434386161@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <14F5785C-E07D-4573-8659-AFBB90271B3F@bsdimp.com> References: <CAJ-VmomwHuoTQV4cKjivbotn0iAec-=-Nnma10NnwCo54Gw_KQ@mail.gmail.com> <14F5785C-E07D-4573-8659-AFBB90271B3F@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-------- In message <14F5785C-E07D-4573-8659-AFBB90271B3F@bsdimp.com>, Warner Losh = write s: >> On Jun 13, 2015, at 4:40 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: >> I'd appreciate feedback here as it does involve addin ga new MK, and I >> really dislike it. :( This reminds me: Somebody should really adopt src/tools/tools/build_option_survey and run it periodically so people can find out the space cost of the various build options. Here is a very old output to show what it produces: http://phk/misc/build_options_stable_8_210741/ -- = Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe = Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence= .
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87668.1434386161>