Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 01 Sep 2001 03:05:09 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Salvo Bartolotta <bartequi@neomedia.it>
To:        "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org>, Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in>, mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: docs/30203: description of security profiles in FAQ is just plain wrong
Message-ID:  <999306309.3b903445f411a@webmail.neomedia.it>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ redirected to -chat; PR is closed ]


>>  > -            is enabled or disabled.</para>
>>  > +          <para>The following table describes what each of the
>>  > +            security profiles does.  The columns are the choices you
>>  
>>  "...what each of the security profiles does".  The verb (does) doesn't
>>  agree in number with the subject (profiles).  Or something like
>>  that--you get the idea.  I'm not an English teacher, so I probably got
>>  the terms all wrong.  I changed 'does' to 'do'.

>Actually, the subject is "each", which is singular.  I'm pretty sure 
>Michael is right on this one.



As others have pointed out, this is essentially correct. 

More precisely, "each of" is used before a pronoun or determiner (the, my, 
those...); the pronoun or noun is plural. As subject, "each of + plural 
expression" is *usually* followed by a singular verb; however, the verb can be 
plural in an informal style.

The use of "each" makes us think of things/people "separately". This explains 
why "nearly every + countable noun" is preferred to "nearly each + (countable 
noun)"; it also explains the (normal) singular verb in the foregoing.




> The prepositional phrase "of the security profiles" confuses things a
> bit.  A trick that my seventh-grade English teacher Mrs. Cantrell taught
> me was to take out the prepositional phrase (which is optional in a
> structural sense anyways) and see if the sentence still seems
> correct...in this case, "each [...] does" vs. "each [...] do".




Sorry, but Mrs Cantrell was plain wrong. :-)

The reasons originate in syntax, as it were, interwoven with semantics, "a 
number of people are wrong" being a trivial counter-example. 

By the way, you may wish to browse http://www.english-usage.com/faq.html and 
look for "a number of" ;-)

-- Salvo

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?999306309.3b903445f411a>