Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 21:54:03 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> Cc: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Device Tree mailing Message-ID: <A33949AB-A5E0-4CF7-ADD6-4237AFA7A26E@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <53140762.1080603@linaro.org> References: <1392222417.13563.93.camel@kazak.uk.xensource.com> <5313E532.2070608@linaro.org> <AB9B7AE9-3391-446D-AEFC-B6EED9FD6D36@bsdimp.com> <53140762.1080603@linaro.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 2, 2014, at 9:38 PM, Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> = wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 03/03/14 10:45, Warner Losh wrote: >>=20 >> On Mar 2, 2014, at 7:13 PM, Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org> = wrote: >>=20 >>> Hello all, >>>=20 >>> A device tree ML has been created to discuss about binding = specification. >>=20 >> Already subscribed a while ago :) >>=20 >>> As discussed on a previous thread [1], FreeBSD device tree binding = doesn't always match bindings used by all the boards. It prevents = FreeBSD to boot out-of-box (e.g. without a modified DT). >>=20 >> A situation we=92d like to correct. I believe the issues from that = thread had been >> corrected (it was a simple bug), and generally we are striving to = have the standard >> DTB work correctly. While we may fall short in a couple of areas, = those are >> simple bugs that should be highlighted. >=20 > I haven't check the FreeBSD for a month now. I saw that Nathan has = reworked FDT code since this thread, thanks to him. >=20 > The bug where FreeBSD were not able to deal with #interrupt-cells > 2 = seems to be fixed (I haven't had time to verify it). Cool! If there=92s a problem, please let us know=85 Atmel (my main focus = these days for somewhat crazy reasons) uses interrupt-cell =3D=3D 3, but I haven=92t tested it to know that it works, just that it doesn=92t = crash right away... > I think the issue on device enumeration from the DT is still there. I = will have to give a try to be sure. Yea, there still might be ordering issues there. We=92re working on a = possible solution to that which works for Atmel and should work for = others. Warner >>> It might be interested to have some people from BSD on this mailing = list. >>=20 >> Yes, the more the merrier. >>=20 >> Warner >>=20 >>> Regards, >>>=20 >>> [1] = http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-xen/2014-January/001974.html >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: [Fwd: New mailing lists] >>> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:26:57 +0000 >>> From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> >>> Organisation: Citrix Systems, Inc. >>> To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com> >>>=20 >>> Can you forward this to whoever @ NetBSD you think might be = interested? >>=20 >> Is NetBSD going to start using FDT now? >=20 > Good question, I think Ian meant FreeBSD here. ;) >=20 > --=20 > Julien Grall
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A33949AB-A5E0-4CF7-ADD6-4237AFA7A26E>