Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Mar 2014 22:13:41 +0000
From:      "Meyer, Conrad" <conrad.meyer@isilon.com>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: [PATCH] x86/mca.c: malloc with correct pointer type
Message-ID:  <A3CAF0E84A34A540B4C74454358E003F1292E8FF@MX103CL02.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <201403131357.07665.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <1394728529-22495-1-git-send-email-conrad.meyer@isilon.com>, <201403131357.07665.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: John Baldwin [jhb@freebsd.org]=0A=
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 10:57 AM=0A=
> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org=0A=
> Cc: Meyer, Conrad=0A=
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mca.c: malloc with correct pointer type=0A=
> =0A=
> > -     cmc_state =3D malloc((mp_maxid + 1) * sizeof(struct cmc_state **)=
,=0A=
> > -         M_MCA, M_WAITOK);=0A=
> > +     cmc_state =3D malloc((mp_maxid + 1) * sizeof(*cmc_state), M_MCA,=
=0A=
> > +         M_WAITOK);=0A=
> >       for (i =3D 0; i <=3D mp_maxid; i++)=0A=
> >               cmc_state[i] =3D malloc(sizeof(struct cmc_state) * mca_ba=
nks,=0A=
> >                   M_MCA, M_WAITOK | M_ZERO);=0A=
> =0A=
> I would rather do 'struct cmc_state *' as I think it is clearer to read, =
but=0A=
> the change is correct.  Thanks!=0A=
> =0A=
> --=0A=
> John Baldwin=0A=
=0A=
Sounds fine to me.=0A=
=0A=
Thanks,=0A=
Conrad=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A3CAF0E84A34A540B4C74454358E003F1292E8FF>