Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 15:27:10 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Baptiste Daroussin <baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Proposal for a new option framework Message-ID: <AANLkTi=wqxY0dqscTp_c3jQ%2BfyzfLn2T24-b8dKsFyWh@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik0%2BnQ3xLJhofbxQsJjXPoSGRM-3fhCXv5SCORW@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTik0%2BnQ3xLJhofbxQsJjXPoSGRM-3fhCXv5SCORW@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Baptiste Daroussin <baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to expose you a new proposal for the framework option. > ... For the people that missed my original thread, I've been working on a dialog replacement for ports. The program is a a) free (MIT licensed) b) smart enough to deal with mutually exclusive options and user-input options c) have the ability have "long descriptions" of options d) more The source code that I've been working on is here: https://code.google.com/p/dialog4ports/source/browse/ This program could integrate well with bapt's patch. Comments, testing, review is welcome - especially in concert with bapt's patch. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=wqxY0dqscTp_c3jQ%2BfyzfLn2T24-b8dKsFyWh>