Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 12:19:52 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Gustau_P=C3=A9rez?= <gperez@entel.upc.edu> Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, David Schultz <das@freebsd.org>, Garrett Cooper <gcooper@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Importing the fusefs kernel module? Message-ID: <AANLkTimVWaRzhuCDHM-F_%2ByYNF9ObqViPSzQ51M0wQRA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CC92D1B.5010701@entel.upc.edu> References: <ia4qnl$bgl$1@dough.gmane.org> <20101025211904.GM2392@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20101026205801.GA39716@zim.MIT.EDU> <D1BAEBBF-4CD4-4C2A-A877-B86D6322E6C7@samsco.org> <AANLkTikR2YuLA-SGc2HKNp94BEBFF0%2BhO2ye-=qJVnwD@mail.gmail.com> <4CC92D1B.5010701@entel.upc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2010/10/28 Gustau P=C3=A9rez <gperez@entel.upc.edu>: > =C2=A0 The point is, do we stick with fuse or do we switch to puffs ? Wha= t is Basically my vote goes to fuse for these reasons: * More file systems are developed for fuse * It's more popular both among the users and 3d party software developers (you mentioned Gnome) * It's better performing, at least in theory, because puffs was not originally written for a multi-threaded kernel (lots of serialization)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimVWaRzhuCDHM-F_%2ByYNF9ObqViPSzQ51M0wQRA>