Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 21:15:44 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> To: Eduardo Meyer <dudu.meyer@gmail.com> Cc: Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov@gmail.com>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: netmap-ipfw: kipfw two instances sharing same port Message-ID: <CA%2BhQ2%2Bh5i5-B6D7fcv1sB-cCNfbu3ije7Ga6W7TO=Qat1MCGKQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAEqdE_4tkzuzdWSS=kHCzJF7yo=-1FxhijjeN2dUVc7fLHuYOg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAEqdE_6EEwyMur161KpKqas_gcJb2mnn-Zb_q65%2BObbJD2oePw@mail.gmail.com> <CALgsdbdTxc7T-hxd4LjO940d0RSHW7ttPQ%2BdfBwOGC=FYKow%2Bw@mail.gmail.com> <CAEqdE_4tkzuzdWSS=kHCzJF7yo=-1FxhijjeN2dUVc7fLHuYOg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Eduardo Meyer <dudu.meyer@gmail.com> wrote= : > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov@gmail.com= > > wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > You could enable multiple queues for each NIC and run single instance o= f > > kipfw on each pair: > > kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0 > > kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix1-1 > > > > And so on ;) i have about 12 mpps with this configuration (on Linux > > netmap). > > > > Wow cool hint and cool numbers. > > I will get everything properly bridged on both kipfw instances, right? > > I need to simulate like a 3-port bridge... this would me more like > > kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0 > kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix2-0 > > But I need the same traffic coming on the wire on ix0 to be available on > both ix1 and ix2. > =E2=80=8Bit won't replicate traffic on the other two ports, that's a different logic. cheers luigi =E2=80=8B > > Will that work like that? I only tried using the default q. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, July 10, 2015, Eduardo Meyer <dudu.meyer@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> should ./kipfw <port0> <port1> and another ./kipfw <port0> <port2> wor= k? > >> > >> I want to have two filtered kipfw instances sharing the same WAN port. > >> > >> So far I did a quick test lab and it worked, but since it's a lab > >> environment I don't know if I should expect other problems when I add = it > >> to > >> run in a real scenario. > >> > >> What problems should I expect? Can they be minimized? > >> > >> Basic stateless filtering only. > >> > >> -- > >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > >> Eduardo Meyer > >> pessoal: dudu.meyer@gmail.com > >> profissional: ddm.farmaciap@saude.gov.br > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > > > > > > -- > > Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov > > > > > > -- > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > Eduardo Meyer > pessoal: dudu.meyer@gmail.com > profissional: ddm.farmaciap@saude.gov.br > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --=20 -----------------------------------------+------------------------------- Prof. Luigi RIZZO, rizzo@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ . Universita` di Pisa TEL +39-050-2217533 . via Diotisalvi 2 Mobile +39-338-6809875 . 56122 PISA (Italy) -----------------------------------------+-------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BhQ2%2Bh5i5-B6D7fcv1sB-cCNfbu3ije7Ga6W7TO=Qat1MCGKQ>