Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 20:59:26 -0700 From: Anton Afanasyev <aasoft@gmail.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Cc: Matthew Rezny <matthew@reztek.cz>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MITM attacks against portsnap and freebsd-update Message-ID: <CAEAhP2hjEEUmt=h_W5nRpsvjr%2BNdP8GdNAUHviUEjF7yif1mog@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53489CF9.70600@freebsd.org> References: <CAHAXwYCGkP-o0VvMXj5S8-KNA45aTvy%2BsrjDL_=8-x9Dza5z5Q@mail.gmail.com> <2012148.SzKMgBGQYg@desktop.reztek> <CAEAhP2iV_ze2ogrw9KJqLEwEzKP%2BpNh9km9kA-jrLwXk7G7rHQ@mail.gmail.com> <53489CF9.70600@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> wrote: > lot s of people have their environments set up assuming this is true. > (me included). It's also a worry abotu wether one has ht eright version of > SVN > or whether you need some special version (we did at one stage)... this > takes all > the qustions out of it. That makes sense. But it seems to me that having extra tools like SVN and rsync in the base, and having to keep them updated, is more trouble than using an extra script to let you install those utilities from ports. I know .. Git-lovers are upset.. > Was this addressed to me, or just a general rant/reference that I did not understand? Anton
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAEAhP2hjEEUmt=h_W5nRpsvjr%2BNdP8GdNAUHviUEjF7yif1mog>