Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:54:12 -0700 From: Tim Gustafson <tjg@soe.ucsc.edu> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using AMD with NFS Mounts Message-ID: <CAG27QgQOt%2BFD_Ef5HuiJV2euTzPLXk-nNN8iJ1L-2DmU0fKPxg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <951954369.1342002.1346354568372.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> References: <CAG27QgS5a121tWEdMpCv-tQNiSQ6pah9pryFLkyar-Vsu_Ud9g@mail.gmail.com> <951954369.1342002.1346354568372.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Although I'd see it as an option initially, planning on supporting both > "forever" would just result in bloat and yet more software to try and > maintain, imho. (Theoretical comment, at least until a solid autofs port > exists.) I don't see that as a valid argument against adding an autofs port. Should we drop the port for Exim or Postgres, because ports for Sendmail and mySQL exist? -- Tim Gustafson tjg@soe.ucsc.edu 831-459-5354 Baskin Engineering, Room 313A
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAG27QgQOt%2BFD_Ef5HuiJV2euTzPLXk-nNN8iJ1L-2DmU0fKPxg>