Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:18:56 +0100 From: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> To: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Davide Italiano <davide@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-projects@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r238907 - projects/calloutng/sys/kern Message-ID: <CAJ-FndDgXZTcniCdjRWnRFpQxUy7jRxF3yZpYt=vi6T7br7r4A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120803174624.K1152@besplex.bde.org> References: <201207301350.q6UDobCI099069@svn.freebsd.org> <201207301732.33474.jhb@freebsd.org> <CAJ-FndD5EO12xsWOAe6u0EvX00q33wxO4OivnGjzj0=T2Oe8uA@mail.gmail.com> <201208021707.22356.jhb@freebsd.org> <CAJ-FndDLn5w3v_V7vX8Q4vB6J6uJrEAEHEvDd=B9Ezo180%2BMFw@mail.gmail.com> <20120803174624.K1152@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/3/12, Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, Attilio Rao wrote: [ trimm ] >> I think it is sensitive we don't add further KPI breakage. I think it >> is a good time we start discussing expansion of INVARIANT_SUPPORT to >> something more general that offers compat shims for all the debugging >> mechanisms. > > Then it would be so large and complicated that it would include and > #include almost everything, but still be harder to use correctly than > it is now. I tought quickly while I was having shower today about that. I think that adding KDB_SUPPORT (and using for both KDB and its consumers, like DDB) and maybe WITNESS_SUPPORT, and enable them separately, would be good enough. Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-FndDgXZTcniCdjRWnRFpQxUy7jRxF3yZpYt=vi6T7br7r4A>