Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 10:41:01 -0700 From: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports Message-ID: <CAN6yY1vXHFVve4caSDBn_zNWL_3jgRxenciprPM7VC_U6cM3bQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BN6PR2001MB173063F414ADB0B1BCB7990B80B20@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> References: <a9ce1576-a254-4e79-3e50-b90d49827a1e@freebsd.org> <BN6PR2001MB1730DAE90491E510EDED691F80B20@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <20180414165707.GA83446@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <BN6PR2001MB173063F414ADB0B1BCB7990B80B20@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 10:12 AM, Carmel NY <carmel_ny@outlook.com> wrote: > On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 09:57:07 -0700, Steve Kargl stated: > > >This discussion occurred with the introduction of FLAVORS, > >which broken all ports management tools except poudriere. > > So, you have not tried "synth" and I assume poudriere. > Please STOP! He is the maintainer of portmaster and, for many people, portmaster is still a critical system component that is not replaceable by either synth or poudriere. Since his goal is to make portmaster work, telling him that he should use another tool is missing the whole point. The issue he is bringing up is NOT flavors. portmaster has supported flavors for some time. It is changes made to a set of ports that seems to break the existing paradigm of the ports system. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1vXHFVve4caSDBn_zNWL_3jgRxenciprPM7VC_U6cM3bQ>