Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 15:13:43 -0700 From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> To: "Devon H. O'Dell" <dodell@offmyserver.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: groff alternative? Message-ID: <D21D977D-97E0-4216-8252-F8DA8DC95759@orthanc.ca> In-Reply-To: <42AF374F.3000705@offmyserver.com> References: <200504262010.49509@harrymail> <20050429200029.GC232@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <F569DB909C927A00B6933382@peregrin.orthanc.ca> <200506141824.17451@harrymail> <20050614185923.GA12375@dragon.NUXI.org> <42AF374F.3000705@offmyserver.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 14, 2005, at 1:00 PM, Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > Would troff/nroff/ps/pdf utilities from Plan 9 be usable? The > license isn't as restrictive. But probably better than what Sun is using. The Plan 9 troff has the advantage of being UTF-8 savvy. It has the disadvantage of requiring the Plan 9 runtime compatibility libraries be brought along. I don't have time right this minute to investigate further. Maybe in a week or two.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D21D977D-97E0-4216-8252-F8DA8DC95759>