Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 09:57:39 +0100 From: Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> To: dan.naumov@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does this disk/filesystem layout look sane to you? Message-ID: <E1MG80Z-000KOZ-K5@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> In-Reply-To: <cf9b1ee00906150139g77725cdeu43a1a8d14cd99fa9@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Haven't had time to test (stuck at work), but I will trust your word > :) Well, this sounds nice and sensible. I am curious though if there It's good isn't it ? I just did another test, replacing both drives wuth smaller ones, and you can't then recursively add an even smaller one in :-) If you were wondering why I tried that, I just wanted to make sure it wasn't an off-by-one error somewhere letting it happen. I guess it encodes a 'minimum size' for the drives. > have been any numbers regarding how much do "actual" drive sizes vary > in the real world when it comes to disks of same > manufacturer/model/size. I guess this probably varies from In my expereince all the ones from the same manufacturer and model are exactly the same size. Admittedly I only ever buy SCSI, but that shouldnt make too much difference should it ? -pete.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1MG80Z-000KOZ-K5>