Date: Sat, 3 Feb 1996 04:41:13 -0600 (CST) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> To: Sujal Patel <smpatel@wam.umd.edu> Cc: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>, Thomas Davis <Thomas.Davis@mnscorp.com>, multimedia@freebsd.org, linux-connectix@crynwr.com Subject: Re: real-world experience with QuickCam in the kernel Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960203043746.5481A-100000@sasami> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960203050941.256A-100000@xi.dorm.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 3 Feb 1996, Sujal Patel wrote: > > a frame. This is unnoticeable while doing single frame captures, but > > completely sucks when doing movies. > Yeah, this really bites. If only they wired up the ACK line, and sent an > interrupt when it was ready to send some data. Hell, get a few of the people on hackers to look at this, maybe they would add a framebuffer for the QC to their "FreeBSD gadget". :) Conceptually, it would look to be a straightforward hardware device. Have fun. | Matthew N. Dodd | winter@jurai.net | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | | Technical Manager | mdodd@intersurf.net | http://www.intersurf.net | | InterSurf Online | "Welcome to the net Sir, would you like a handbasket?"|
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960203043746.5481A-100000>