Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 May 1998 21:34:00 -0400 (EDT)
From:      jack <jack@germanium.xtalwind.net>
To:        Tony Kimball <alk@pobox.com>
Cc:        hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Better luck with PPro 166 or 180 at 200 MHz?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.980528212621.26626A-100000@germanium.xtalwind.net>
In-Reply-To: <199805281422.JAA02276@compound.east.sun.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 28 May 1998, Tony Kimball wrote:

> I'm trying to decide whether to get a pair of 166 or 180 MHz PPro's.
> Which has a better probability of running at 200MHz, a pair of
> 166MHz 512k cache, or a pair of 180MHz 256k cache?

Don't know about the 166, but I've got a 180 that's been running
at 200, 24x7, for the past few months without any problems.
YMMV.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack O'Neill                    Systems Administrator / Systems Analyst
jack@germanium.xtalwind.net     Crystal Wind Communications, Inc.
          Finger jack@germanium.xtalwind.net for my PGP key.
   PGP Key fingerprint = F6 C4 E6 D4 2F 15 A7 67   FD 09 E9 3C 5F CC EB CD
               enriched, vcard, HTML messages > /dev/null
       Mail from netcom.com blocked until they stop relaying SPAM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980528212621.26626A-100000>