Date: Sun, 31 Oct 1999 10:44:04 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@freebsd.org> To: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org, chris@calldei.com Subject: Re: stpcpy() Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910311042310.54954-100000@green.myip.org> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.991031164359.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > Well if you have a port which has this stuff in it (stpcpy, getopt, etc) then > where's the problem? If you are building by hand adding -I/usr/local/include > and -lcompatlinux to your makefile is easy, and if its a port its transparent > to the end user. I think this is the best idea proposed so far, just to chime in and be counted. It makes it easy for ports to provide this compatibilty, and that's what's important. > > --- > Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer > for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au > "The nice thing about standards is that there > are so many of them to choose from." > -- Andrew Tanenbaum > -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / green@FreeBSD.org `------------------------------' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9910311042310.54954-100000>