Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 09:20:06 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: Josef Karthauser <joe@pavilion.net> Cc: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>, "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@freebsd.org>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/ls extern.h ls.1 ls.c ls.h print.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006050919000.72373-100000@salmon.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <20000604231722.H620@pavilion.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 4 Jun 2000, Josef Karthauser wrote: > On Sat, Jun 03, 2000 at 11:59:24PM -0400, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > > On Sat, 3 Jun 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > That's 100K difference and certainly a significant increase, though > > > one could also perhaps argue that at 189K, ls(1) is no longer the > > > thin, svelte utility we remember from her youth and another chocolate > > > eclair or two isn't going to make that big a difference at this point. > > > > I think having a /bin/ls and a /usr/bin/ls would be the way to go then. > > > > /bin/ls can be the "thin, svelte utility" > > /usr/bin/ls can have all the eclairs it wants. > > If we're going to do that we may as well keep colour support as a > separate port. There's no point having two ls's in the tree IMHO. Or we could develop a "Plug In" model for ls... -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 20 8442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0006050919000.72373-100000>