Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 16:00:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: threads comment Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0107311550441.35786-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Y'know, if we'd called the thread a "process" and the thing that has a pid a "task" (or something) the actual functional changes would be a HECK of a lot clearer in the diffs because I have 50k of functional changes and 800+KB of - struct proc *pB + struct thread *td; (just a comment) Actually if we left processes as processes and then created 'super-processes', I think you could start now and still finish first. (so far I have replaced about 4000 instances of struct proc with struct thread (mostly by hand)) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0107311550441.35786-100000>