Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 18:46:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek <hoek@hwcn.org> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/4183 Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980424184209.4342A-100000@james.hwcn.org> In-Reply-To: <199804241607.MAA09700@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 24 Apr 1998, Garrett Wollman wrote: > > Is it even worthwhile leaving these "suspended" instead of > > "closed"? > > I think so. While the effect may be the same, it is useful to > distinguish between ``reasonable but unfinished'' and ``completely > dealt with''. FWIW, the aggressive mail-archive user will realize that I argued on the side of using "suspended" when phk first came under attack for doing this. My comment was referring to the single specific PR, which seemed to fall into the same category as "Will someone please upgrade Perl"; the presence of a PR for this type of request doesn't seem to help much. -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.96.980424184209.4342A-100000>