Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 4 Jan 2002 08:08:47 -0800 (PST)
From:      Ben Gross <ben@bengross.com>
To:        Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        <gnome@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: gnomedb tarball updated without updating version again
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201040752590.23864-100000@alanb.com>
In-Reply-To: <3C35728B.C9FA5FAC@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Maxim Sobolev wrote:

> Ben Gross wrote:
> > 
> > It seems like they upgraded the tarball again without upgrading the
> > version number....
> > 
> > ===>  Extracting for gnomedb-0.2.93_2
> > >> Checksum mismatch for gnome-db-0.2.93.tar.gz.
> > Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file
> > (/usr/ports/databases/gnomedb/distinfo)
> > are up to date.  If you are absolutely sure you want to override this
> > check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]".
> > *** Error code 1
> 
> What is the md5 checksum of gnome-db-0.2.93.tar.gz file on your
> system?

Ok, now I feel like I am in the twilight zone, here is the one I had when 
I first mailed you.
MD5 (gnome-db-0.2.93.tar.gz) = c4c6500f530a47d8c4f2fe9fd4b61e12

I just did a make distclean and grabbed a new copy, now I have:
MD5 (gnome-db-0.2.93.tar.gz) = c19e062606e6780581fd9309deb91da8

The second time it worked. Then libgda failed for the same reason.

The first checksum was:
MD5 (libgda-0.2.93.tar.gz) = f949131a2c8435f9a3ebbc89ec119989

then
MD5 (libgda-0.2.93.tar.gz) = 29e9831a5cfdec308042ef34be453258

Again, the second one worked. I just grabbed the sources last night with a
machine with a good connection. Strange. Anyway, the compile has been 
running for a while without a hitch now.

Thanks,
Ben




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.33.0201040752590.23864-100000>