Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 15:27:28 -0500 (EST) From: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> To: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?= <michael.grunewald@laposte.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reviving a dead port Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711041526120.29734@vegeta.p6m7g8.net> In-Reply-To: <864pg22q01.fsf@Llea.celt.neu> References: <864pg22q01.fsf@Llea.celt.neu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Second, the port version I wrote is anachronic, since some people may > have 1.46 installed (or prior 1.45.5 version, but PORT_REVISION can be > used here so this is not an issue). What's the correct way (or least > annoyance way) to handle this backtime travel? See PORTEPOCH Also, PORT_REVISION is PORTREVISION http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html#MAKEFILE-NAMING-REVEPOCH -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci (philip@riderway.com) 323.219.4708 Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. http://riderway.com 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.64.0711041526120.29734>