Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 15:03:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Christopher Sedore <cmsedore@mailbox.syr.edu> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@ucb.crimea.ua>, Jayson Nordwick <nordwick@scam.xcf.berkeley.edu>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/13075 (was: Re: aio_*) Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.10.9909161501270.1425-100000@rodan.syr.edu> In-Reply-To: <37E13D66.AB9889B8@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Wes Peters wrote: > Christopher Sedore wrote: > > > > On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > > > Do you by any change have an idea how to fix PR kern/13075 > > > (signal is not posted for async I/O on raw devices) > > > > Yes. There is no code to post the signal unless the job is of the lio > > variety. Writing a fix took about 15 minutes (including reboot). > > Extensive testing not included, though the test program provided with the > > PR now functions. > > Great, now do you want to tackle aio_cancel? ;^) I've been holding off to see whether I can get the other aio patches for improved socket io committed. I don't want to do two versions of aio_cancel (the changes for sockets alter the way things are queued and hence the way that cancels have to be done). -Chris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.4.10.9909161501270.1425-100000>