Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 11:43:28 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Mel Flynn <mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Tim Judd <tajudd@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Kalle_M=F8ller?= <kalle.moller@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Maintaining a FreeBSD system - Workcycle Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905071142070.39932@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <200905070658.18661.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> References: <8250ac3f0905061743l21a9a87fv9ca3aa50cb176873@mail.gmail.com> <ade45ae90905062048o3028e8a5jd7c222ed63f9a5dd@mail.gmail.com> <200905070658.18661.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> more so (for the base system I just install them always, as it doesn't pay off > in the long run to skip them). Portaudit for a (web)server has a lot of > notifications that "are not critical", like several issues over the last year > with php's safe mode that any sane webserver admin doesn't use. i don't know really what's PHP safe mode, just if someone says he/she needs PHP i make separate jail, and configure whatever she/he wants. it for sure have a lots of bugs (in PHP directly), and even more security holes by stupidly designed webpage he/she will put, but i don't care. it will not hurt anyone else ;)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0905071142070.39932>