Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 10:05:22 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193582] [MAINTAINER] net-mgmt/zabbix22-server: Update to 2.2.6 Message-ID: <bug-193582-13-a3Q1cWIVol@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-193582-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-193582-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193582 --- Comment #11 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- Because: The committer that takes the PR may not be familiar with the port. He/she has no way of knowing if it's currently in good shape (although likely at this point) and he has no way of knowing if the update maintains the good status. Note -- plenty of simply updates forget to update the pkg-plist. Without QA checks, the port will build but it will fail poudriere with extra checks (bulk -t or testport) So just saying, "This is simple update" is really proving nothing. Poudriere checks more than "successful compile". If you don't do it, the committer must (he should anyway, but it depends on the reputation of the submitter). And committers want to know there's a good chance of success before they take the PR. They don't like untested patches -- untested as in: not tested by poudriere with -t option. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-193582-13-a3Q1cWIVol>