Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 08:22:46 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 201257] [MAINTAINER-UPDATE] dns/knot2: update to 2.0.0 Message-ID: <bug-201257-13-w4hwV0dX7p@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-201257-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-201257-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201257 Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erwin@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #2 from Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Leo Vandewoestijne from comment #0) Hi Leo, It depends on what you think the users expect to be the default version, that should be the knot port. I think the developers recommend knot2 as the default version, in which case you're right in renaming the current port to knot1 and knot2 to knot. On the other hand, since the syntax of the configuration file changes, it might be better to leave knot2 as is to not surprise our users when they upgrade, and things suddenly break (at least, they would have to have a big warning in pkg-message), and maybe move knot to knot1 to not suggest it is the recommended port. What do you think? Erwin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-201257-13-w4hwV0dX7p>