Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 Oct 2015 03:27:45 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 203929] [UPDATE] www/seahub: Update to 5.1.0 with several bug fixes
Message-ID:  <bug-203929-13-8q76QjEHUw@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-203929-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-203929-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203929

--- Comment #6 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> ---
@Jason, with any approvals/feedback items where the maintainer isn't changing
the issue themselves, please reference how/where the feedback/approval was
obtained.

Ideally, the maintainer can/should set these flags themselves, which avoids
ambiguities and potential conflicts ("no, i didnt really/explicitly/officially
say this or that".

Was there an issue for the MAINTAINER change request and approval? If so,
reference that as a/the blocking issue for these changes so that the audit
trail can be followed easily

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-203929-13-8q76QjEHUw>