Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 18:44:57 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 216707] exp-run: Update lang/gcc from GCC 4.9 to GCC 5 Message-ID: <bug-216707-13-O8m42uE9OM@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-216707-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-216707-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216707 --- Comment #37 from arrowd <6yearold@gmail.com> --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #36) > Your proposal needs to include all CPAN, rubygems, and python ports that = fall into the same category, then, no? I can't say for these languages, as I haven't used them. When Haskell ports were starting, Haskell package ecosystem was in such sta= te, that you would quickly get into dependencies hell if you install packages globally (read /usr/local). Haskell ports were solving this problem by providing subset of all Haskell packages that are guaranteed to work togeth= er. But now=20 a) Haskell package manager has "sandbox" feature that allows to easily prep= are whatever environment you need. b) There is ports-like project that releases package sets with known-to-work-together versions. So now ports are complete duplication of this work. > Nudge the Haskell team. They might be quiet but they are still around. Last post on maillist was October 2015. Last commit in the development repo= was on February 2016. IRC channel is silent for 6 months. Even when the team was active, it was only pgj@, so there isn't a team even. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-216707-13-O8m42uE9OM>