Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 17:02:14 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237726] www/mod_md-devel removed, with no alternative provided Message-ID: <bug-237726-7788-ccdvHdjk1D@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-237726-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-237726-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237726 --- Comment #2 from Igor Galić <i.galic@brainsware.org> --- I understand the consequence, and what i need to do, i just don't agree. Closing the port, means that a *binary* package is gone. >From the closing message, it ~feels~ like you could just get away with installing a different binary package. But that is just a lie i wanted to believe. downloading the ports tree, and rebuilding a package, is *vastly* different= UX compared to =E2=80=A6 installing a package. Especially on my very cheap clo= ud VM. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-237726-7788-ccdvHdjk1D>