Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 18 Jul 2020 18:49:50 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        python@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 247686] [NEW PORT] devel/py-class-registry: Factory+Registry pattern for Python classes
Message-ID:  <bug-247686-21822-0N96fV45iU@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-247686-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-247686-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D247686

Henry <PopularMoment@protonmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |PopularMoment@protonmail.co
                   |                            |m

--- Comment #3 from Henry <PopularMoment@protonmail.com> ---
This should probably be called py-class-registry2 as there are 2.x [1] and a
3.x [3] branches from the same project [3] but it's incompatible with at le=
ast
B2 [4], which is the initial use case.

Also note the 3.x branch dropped 2.7 support.

[1] https://pypi.org/project/class-registry/
[2] https://pypi.org/project/phx-class-registry/
[3] https://github.com/todofixthis/class-registry/tags
[4]
https://github.com/Backblaze/B2_Command_Line_Tool/blob/49a29b6d786e68db58ff=
8303c718fdab9d43eaaa/requirements.txt#L4

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-247686-21822-0N96fV45iU>