Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 21:51:23 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 74654] libsupc++.a lacks necessary functions Message-ID: <bug-74654-8-ZfF3JKdaaH@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-74654-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-74654-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D74654 Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |markmi@dsl-only.net --- Comment #4 from Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> --- (In reply to Pedro F. Giffuni from comment #3) TARGET_ARCH=3Dpowerpc and TARGET_ARCH=3Dpowerpc64 of tier 2 are are still g= cc 4.2.1 and libstdc++ based as far as built-in system compilers go. Are they now libcxxrt based: Is libstdc++ now working on top of libcxxrt instead of on libsupc++ ? (Clang is not sufficient yet for powerpc64 or powerpc.) powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc and its powerpc64-gcc might be considered as cover= ing powerpc64, allowing libc++ (and libcxxrt). Are they considered as covering = the issue for powerpc64? But there is no equivalent for powerpc (non-64). [I do not claim to know much about the status for the likes of mips and spa= rc but might some of them also have such issues?] Should this report be left open but only for some tier 2 architectures? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-74654-8-ZfF3JKdaaH>