Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:45:14 +0800 From: "Jiawei Ye" <leafy7382@gmail.com> To: "Kris Kennaway" <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Sergey Matveychuk <sem@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: portupgrade ideas page Message-ID: <c21e92e20606061845g65e840eh1d64553d119e1b30@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060606211113.GA7845@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <4485DBF5.3070705@FreeBSD.org> <20060606211113.GA7845@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:48:05PM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > > Portupgrade ideas page was created on our wiki server: > > http://wiki.freebsd.org/portupgrade > > > > I would like to hear your ideas, wishes and comments. > My biggest wish for portupgrade is to respect make knobs in pkgtools.conf when deciding package dependancies. For example, everytime I do "make fetchindex" or let portsnap rebuilt INDEX-7, "pkgdb -F" will report that portupgrade depends on a non-existent db40, while 'databases/ruby-bdb' => 'WITH_BDB43=yes' was set in pkgtools.conf. Jiawei -- "Without the userland, the kernel is useless." --inspired by The Tao of Programming
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c21e92e20606061845g65e840eh1d64553d119e1b30>